顯示具有 Predator; Testing Aposematism and Mimicry 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Predator; Testing Aposematism and Mimicry 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2009年2月23日 星期一

Butterfly effects in mimicry? Combining signal and taste can twist the relationship of Müllerian co-mimics

Butterfly effects in mimicry? Combining signal and taste can twist the relationship of Müllerian co-mimics

Behavioural Evology and Sociobiology, Vol. 62, No. 8, 1267-1276

Eira Ihalainen, Leena Lindström, Johanna Mappes and Sari Puolakkainen
Department of Biological and Environmental Science, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä

Müllerian co-mimics are aposematic species that resemble each other; sharing a warning signal is thought to be mutually beneficial for the co-mimics by reducing per capita predation risk. In Batesian mimicry, edible mimics avoid predation by resembling an aposematic model species. The protection of both the model and the mimic is weakened when the mimics are abundant compared to the models. The quasi-Batesian view suggests that defended (Müllerian) co-mimics, when unequal in their defences, could also show a Batesian-like trend of increasing mortality with increasing abundance of a less defended “mimic”. We manipulated frequencies of unequally distasteful artificial co-mimics that were prey for great tits. The co-mimics had different signals (imperfect mimicry) but were equally preferred by the birds when palatable. Unexpectedly, when unpalatable, one of the signals was easier for the birds to learn to avoid. Consequently, during predator learning, the signal design of the prey strongly affected mortality of the co-mimics; there was an interaction between the signal and frequency treatments, but increasing the frequency of a less defended “mimic” did not increase co-mimic mortalities as predicted. In contrast, in a memory test that followed, the effect of signal design disappeared; if the birds had experienced high frequency of “mimics” during learning, co-mimic mortalities did subsequently increase. Since the effect of co-mimic frequencies on mortalities changed depending on the signal design of the prey and predator experience, the results suggest that mimetic relationship may be an unpredictable interplay of several factors in addition to taste and abundance.

Keywords: Aposematism - Quasi-Batesian mimicry - Predator psychology - Avoidance learning - Memory

2009年1月31日 星期六

The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs

The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs

Biology letters (2009) Vol. 5, No. 1, 51-54
Brice P. Noonan, Aaron A. Comeault
Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University

Demonstrations of interactions between diverse selective forces on bright coloration in defended species are rare. Recent work has suggested that not only do the bright colours of Neotropical poison frogs serve to deter predators, but they also play a role in sexual selection, with females preferring males similar to themselves. These studies report an interaction between the selective forces of mate choice and predation. However, evidence demonstrating phenotypic discrimination by potential predators on these polymorphic species is lacking. The possibility remains that visual (avian) predators possess an inherent avoidance of brightly coloured diurnal anurans and purifying selection against novel phenotypes within populations is due solely to non-random mating. Here, we examine the influence of predation on phenotypic variation in a polymorphic species of poison frog, Dendrobates tinctorius. Using clay models, we demonstrate a purifying role for predator selection, as brightly coloured novel forms are more likely to suffer an attack than both local aposematic and cryptic forms. Additionally, local aposematic forms are attacked, though infrequently, indicating ongoing testing/learning and a lack of innate avoidance. These results demonstrate predator-driven phenotypic purification within populations and suggest colour patterns of poison frogs may truly represent a ‘magic trait’.

Keywords: aposematic, selection, Dendrobates, magic trait

Role of different colours of aposematic insects in learning, memory and generalization of naïve bird predators

Role of different colours of aposematic insects in learning, memory and generalization of naïve bird predators

Animal Behaviour (2009) Vol. 77, No. 2, 327-336
Kateřina Svádová(a, b), Alice Exnerová(a), Pavel Štys(a), Eva Landová(a), Jan Valenta(c), Anna Fučíková(c) and Radomír Socha(d)
aDepartment of Zoology, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
bDepartment of Biology, University Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
cDepartment of Chemical Physics and Optics, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
dBiology Center ASCR, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

Among the various properties of visual warning signals, colour seems to be especially important for avian predators. We tested the role of particular colours of an aposematic insect (firebug, Pyrrhocoris apterus; Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae) in unlearned avoidance, learning, memory and generalization of a naïve avian predator (great tit, Parus major). The wild type of the firebug is aposematic, red-and-black, and its colour mutants (white, yellow, orange) retain the same black pattern; the bug can be made artificially nonaposematic (painted uniformly brown). Wild-caught great tits avoid the firebug depending on colour, and their reaction to variously coloured prey is a result of avoidance learning and may vary according to their experience. We trained naïve great tits to avoid firebugs of different colours, and then gave some birds a memory test with firebugs of the same colour and other birds a generalization test with firebugs of a different colour. Naïve, hand-reared great tits showed no initial avoidance and attacked firebugs irrespective of colour. They learned to avoid all the colour forms at a similar rate. The generalization was asymmetric: birds that learned to avoid red firebugs did not generalize their experience to yellow or white mutants whereas birds that learned to avoid yellow mutants generalized their experience to red firebugs. The red colour thus represents a more effective signal than the yellow; predation by birds could have played a crucial role in selectively favoured evolutionary transitions from yellow to red coloration in pyrrhocorids.

Keywords: asymmetric generalization; avoidance learning; firebug; great tit; Parus major; peak shift; Pyrrhocoris apterus; signal memorability; warning signal

2008年11月2日 星期日

Testing the predatory behaviour of Podarcis sicula (Reptilia: Lacertidae) towards aposematic and non-aposematic preys

Bonacci, Teresa, Gaetano Aloise, Pietro Brandmayr, Tullia Z. Brandmayr and Massimo Capula. 2008. Testing the predatory behaviour of Podarcis sicula (Reptilia: Lacertidae) towards aposematic and non-aposematic preys. Amphibia- Reptilia. 29 (3): 449-453. [t.bonacci@unical.it]

Abstract: Food preferences and the effects of prey chemical repellents in the dietary behaviour of Podarcis sicula were tested using four species of Carabid beetles as prey models. The goal of the study was to assess (i) the ability of P. sicula to recognize insect preys provided with chemical repellents and aposematic colorations under laboratory conditions, and (ii) the importance of chemical signals used by the prey model as antipredatory strategy. Preys used in this study were Brachinus sclopeta and Anchomenus dorsalis (aposematic species) and Amara anthobia and A. aenea (non-aposematic species). Aposematic species are characterized by warning color pattern and by production of chemical repellents, while non-aposematic ones do not. Amara anthobia and A. aenea were attacked with high frequency by P. sicula, Brachinus sclopeta and Anchomenus dorsalis with low frequency. Non-aposematic species were preyed more often than the aposematic ones. Brachinus sclopeta was preyed after low latency, while Amara anthobia and A. aenea after long latency. Non-aposematic species were captured and eaten without difficulty, while when B. sclopeta or A. dorsalis were captured, lizards always tossed their head and then rub the snout on the soil, probably because of the unpalatability of aposematic preys.